Articles

Facebook Violates Privacy Laws…Yet Again

July 17th, 2009 by Kiwi Commons

Facebook violates privacy laws again

Social networking giant Facebook, has been in the hot seat in recent months, receiving bad press as a phishing hotspot, sex offender haven, and lawsuit opportunity.  This month, Facebook has found itself in yet another legal scuffle for violating privacy laws.  The Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic says Facebook has been breaking the law by retaining users’ personal information indefinitely even after accounts are closed.

According to Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart, this is just one of numerous privacy violations Facebook has on its plate.  A court injunction was a last resort for Stoddart after discussions with the company led to no course of action.   To patch up this one security hole, Stoddart says Facebook should permanently delete user data of closed accounts after a reasonable length of time.

Despite Facebook’s priority in delivering member privacy, Stoddart has found critical vulnerabilities in the site’s operation that pose serious privacy risks.  For one, she is pushing for more transparency of the site’s privacy policies to guard users against making uninformed decisions about how they share their personal information.  Another privacy bug to be fixed on her list is the lack of safeguards to prevent access of user’s personal information by third-party application developers.

There are also complaints that Facebook is exploiting user information for commercial purposes like targeted advertising.  Sharing the concerns of Stoddart are Facebook members like Lisa Feinberg, worried that “Facebook is deceiving its users” by failing to clearly inform users what they’re signing up for.

Especially at risk are Canadians between the ages 14 to 25, who are unaware of the privacy controls available, or how to use them to their advantage, and how their private information can be misused by third-parties.

But the onslaught of complaints directed at Facebook have some wondering how such a high-profile site becomes the target of security scrutiny while smaller social networks  are flying under the radar.  But according to the director of the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic Phillipa Lawson, all are suspect.  There is just a higher risk of exposure on Facebook since it is the most popular online hangout in Canada, appealing to teens.

If Stoddart sees no course of action from Facebook in the next 30 days, the case can be taken to the Federal Court of Canada to enforce the recommended changes.

Source: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/667167

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • indy55
    wow... way to be Big Brother ... for commercial gain

    re:Jackie
    These days they can put anything in those terms, who actually reads through all 10 pages anyway? I'm sure that somewhere in there I owe Facebook my firstborn... if not facebook then probably another Microsoft or Apple product that I had to agree to terms for :S
  • Anonymous
    tsk tsk Facebook. But all social networks' security measures I bet, are not exempted of the same privacy infringements. I remember sentinel was all over facebook for their security measures being insufficient in booting out pedophiles or the pedophile transfer from myspace to facebook, but i say theyre just pushing for facebook to adopt their security technology to set them as a standard and to get more publicity. Tsk tsk these biased critics.
  • Jose P.
    yeah i remember last year, there was the whole controversy over Facebook using the Beacon tool. it would publish user's off-site purchases and activities on Facebook.
  • Jackie
    i dunno if I agree with the statement - "Facebook is deceiving its users" because in the privacy policy on Facebook they state that some user information is subject to use by both advertisers and developers.

    and it's not just teens who are unaware of how to use privacy controls and how their information can be exploited. it's very much adults too. they're just more conscious of content that can be self-harming.
blog comments powered by Disqus